Some channel deals are memorable for all the wrong reasons, and the flaws are often related to a failure to forge strong working partner relationships that deliver the best customer solutions – as several partners have revealed to Channel Pro.
Partnership problems can often be spotted early on and are likelier with multi-tier, multi-partner channels, according to Ian Moyse, chief revenue officer at sales software provider OneUp Sales and a 30-year veteran of the IT channel.
The most difficult deals can also seem too easy to begin with.
"Sometimes they tell you confidently that they just want to buy X. It can be a hard one to throw that back and ask: 'Are you sure?'," he says.
"So you think you need to do this thing, and you do it. But that's just your interpretation. You've asked certain questions and come up with this assimilation. It's like a doctor prescribing medicine when they haven't seen the patient. How do you know it's the right thing?"
Moyse says miscommunication can then get worse the further away partners are from the vendor, making for potential misunderstandings about the nature of the relationship and the solution.
The customer then becomes frustrated as they’re not sure who to blame for what’s gone wrong, while IT providers can end up providing additional commercial, technical or other special resources to support a deal.
Additionally, sales professionals can be tempted to oversell – positioning their company or partner solution as the definitive answer. Sometimes, this might be because the partner simply hasn't stuck around long enough post-implementation to find out whether a solution really delivers.
If you're not speaking directly with the end client yourself, things can turn sour fast, he confirms.
"Get on the phone together and work it out," says Moyse. "Be on those first calls together too. Don't assume you know everything and don't guess."
Kevin Eley, UK and Europe vice president of sales at security platform vendor LogRhythm, similarly finds that the most difficult deals stem from multilateral, complex relationships. Miscommunication in the procurement process especially can catch channel partners out.
"Once we were told that the organisation in question had appointed a third-party procurement agency to run a 'very robust and tightly managed, highly scrutinised request for information (RFI)/ request for proposal (RFP) process'," Eley reveals.
Eley recalls that the team did not know if this agency had ever been involved in similar solution discovery or design, or cybersecurity functions. Despite doubts, they decided to proceed.
"Our team had really constructive discussions, directly with the expected users. We felt that we were building rapport, and were a good fit," he says. "We won the deal, and felt good about that until about a week later."
They were then told by the third-party agency that an unnamed organisation had contested the outcome, looking at the procurement process, and decided to rerun the entire process again. This obviously increased the resource outlay, with a knock-on impact on the actual project after winning both requests for proposal...